Social Judgment Research Team (Research Team 11)
In fall of 2016, we are (from L to R): Top row: Ximena Leon, Aryssa Walters, Prof. Leigh Ann Vaughn, Alane Schmelkin, and Irene Howard. Bottom row: Nicky Liddick, Sam Dorazio, Corie Levine, and Genesis Alvarez.
Research questions for fall 2017 include:
- What can influence how many friends people claim?
- What can influence how well people do when pursuing their goals?
- Many Labs 5: What will this world-wide research project show about the reproducibility of psychological research findings? For the Ithacan story about our team's involvement in Many Labs 1, click here
This team studies how people make sense of their internal states and form social judgments. Students work together – with constant professor-student and student-student mentoring - on all aspects of our research, including reading and writing reaction papers about various aspects of the theoretical background, designing studies, scheduling and running participants, analyzing and interpreting results, and presenting research at conferences.
The structure of our graded work is highly consistent week to week. Almost every week, students run a research session in a lab, recruit for research participants, read an assigned research article, and do 1-2 short writing assignments and one short statistics assignment. We use these assignments as a basis for collaborating on the design and analysis of our research.
Because the course involves doing real research, team involves a degree of risk and flexibility as we work together to figure out how to move ahead with challenges that are complex and lack neat formulations or precise definitions. High-quality and engaged mentoring – by Professor Vaughn of all students and by more senior students of more junior students - is part of what makes this team fun and rewarding.